Thursday, April 5, 2012

Connecticut Justice

Connecticut State Senate Debates Death Penalty

Connecticut now joins much of the world in getting rid of the death penalty.   Capital punishment has never been shown to be a deterrent to crime.   A life sentence without parole may give years for someone to deal with what they've done.   In the Michael Ross case, the actual death sentence may take decades to be carried out even when a convicted murderer wants to die.   When there is a wrongful conviction, the ultimate penalty cannot be undone once it's carried out.   Of course, whatever the justice system does will not bring a murder victim back.   Unlike Texas, Connecticut's history of carrying out death sentences has been very infrequent over the past fifty years.    While I support the State Senate's move, there's one case where most of us would like to see an exception.   The especially heinous Cheshire home invasion murders lead me to believe the world would be better off without these two monsters around, and the one survivor of that horrible crime agrees.    

When we think of justice, we usually think of the victims and their families, but what about the neighborhood?    Montville already greets passersby on I-395 with a warning not to stop in the area of a maximum security prison.    Hasn't this town already shouldered enough of the burden of hosting violent criminals without having to be home to a treatment center for sex offenders?   According to NBC Connecticut, opponents of the facility such as Councilor Dana McFee feel they were lied to by the commissioner for the state Department of Correction when they were promised that the “worst of the worst” wouldn’t live here.   The record of successful treatment for sexual offenders is very low.    I know these offenders have to go somewhere, but Montville has shouldered enough of the burden. 

No comments:

Post a Comment